







In the 2010s I'd often hear people say, "I didn't read the book, I just read the blog post."
Now it's more like: "I read an AI summary of the tweet thread of the blog post of the book."
Where do the benefits of compressing information end? Saving time is good!
But I feel I can often sense when a person mostly consumes highly compressed information. These people are often very smart, but their intelligence is "Twitterized" ("X-ified"?) In conversation they resist depth and their reasoning is bite-sized.
But how much does going deep actually matter? Maybe "knowing the gist" of most things is fine in a world where so much is delegated to external intelligence.
Yet I have to believe there's a limit. Most value accrues from depth. The overlooked pattern appears to those who know the existing patterns. The wisdom to know how and how not to delegate comes from time.
Going deep feels both easier and harder than ever. AI is a magical universal tutor. Yet the temptation to compress everything always lurks nearby.


















